From reading my earlier posts you might notice I’m NOT a fan of ISAT (Illinois School Assessment Test). ISAT is seriously deficient in two areas.
1) It is designed to be nice to the Chicago Public School system. Thus, the test is pretty easy and many suburban schools handily meet its requirements, especially if they are not a destination for English Language Learners.
This encourages parents to think highly of their schools and compare this relative measurements among neighboring districts. The real problem is that the system diverts their focus away from the absolute decline of achievements of their children and their schools.
2) The results are disseminated to the parents in fuzzy relative terms. Thus parents learn that children in their school exceed (or meet or fail to meet) ”the proficiency level on the ISAT”. It does not report the school’s actual average ISAT score for the tested grades. Please note that the high school report cards do report bluntly the actual average ACT scores for each school.
Another secret of the ISAT is that the “proficiency level” on the Math portion has been drastically lowered in 2006. It used to be that a 66% score on the Math portion was “meeting proficiency”. Now a 33% score “meets proficiency”. The administrators, teachers and students in Chicago Public School can take a breather. My personal opinion is that otherwise the whole CPS system would fail under NCLB and be forced into handing out vouchers for kids to go to Catholic and charter schools! Meanwhile the suburban schools glide along.
Finally, check out this study on the ISAT:
http://peoria.k12.il.us/msmith/isu_cohort/soc465/reading_packet/07%20-%20Rau%2C%20et.%20al%2C%20Dark%20Engine%20of%20Illinois%20Education.pdf
It was written in 2001, thus just before NCLB. It does a good job of predicting the negative effects of this super-important test in which our Illinois govt can change the rules anytime.
What is my idea for this? In short, it is to redo or restart the Illinois test so that it matches the standards of NAEP (National Assessment of Educational Progress). That would certainly be tangibly embarrassing to most of our schools in the first several years. I believe it’s worth the embarrassment for the long-term success of our kids.